Bug#430649: Bug#209008: New proposed wording for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

2007-12-31 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:34:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I thought the number of affected packages would be small. Can you point > > me to that analisys ? > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/12/msg00020.html > > 204 built BROK

Bug#430649: Bug#209008: New proposed wording for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

2007-12-31 Thread Russ Allbery
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I thought the number of affected packages would be small. Can you point > me to that analisys ? http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/12/msg00020.html 204 built BROKEN packages 1408 FAILED 230 FAILED, even with regular build 8986 suc

Bug#430649: Bug#209008: New proposed wording for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

2007-12-31 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 11:24:45AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The majority of packages already supports parallel builds by simply > > passing the appropiate -j flag to make. Not that I object to a > > "parallel" parameter since it can bring some b