On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > * Base-files should be changed.
>
> * Base-files must require that the fixed dpkg is installed.
>
> If base-files doesn't depend/pre-depend on dpkg, downgrading dpkg and
> downgrading any other deb that uses /usr/share/doc will lose all its
> docu
On Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 08:39:37PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Instead, I propose that:
> * Any dpkg bug in this area be fixed. If I can figure out what people
> claim the bug is I'll fix it. (I won't build an NMU, but we seem to
> have no shortage of people willing to do dpkg NMUs.)
Please fix
Ian proposes the following wrt /usr/doc vs /usr/share/doc:
> * Any dpkg bug in this area be fixed. If I can figure out what people
> claim the bug is I'll fix it. (I won't build an NMU, but we seem to
> have no shortage of people willing to do dpkg NMUs.)
The bug was explained to me in the seco
Mike Goldman writes ("Bug#42634: [PROPOSAL] Automatic migration to
/usr/share/doc"):
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.0.1.0
>
> Following up my objection to #42477, I propose the following transitional
> plan for migrating files from /usr/doc to /usr/share/doc when
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.0.1.0
Following up my objection to #42477, I propose the following transitional
plan for migrating files from /usr/doc to /usr/share/doc when potato
releases.
1. Base-files should be modified to execute a script, automatically
migrating all directories in /usr/d
5 matches
Mail list logo
