Bug#42236: shlibs without a version (was Re: weekly policy summary)

1999-08-07 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 10:39:13AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Method for shlibs to work with libfoo.so (#42236) > > * Under discussion. > > * Proposed by Joseph Carter. > > * This is a proposal to make binary-only shared libs that have no > > soname work with dpkh-shlibdeps. The idea

Re: Bug#42236: shlibs without a version (was Re: weekly policy summary)

1999-08-07 Thread Joseph Carter
On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 07:11:57PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > First, this is horrible and abhorrent, and unversioned libraries shouldn't > > ever happen, and other packages shouldn't start depending on them and > > icky icky icky icky ewww. > > Maybe I'm just being simple, but couldn't one

Re: Bug#42236: shlibs without a version (was Re: weekly policy summary)

1999-08-07 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Sat, 7 Aug 1999, Anthony Towns wrote: > First, this is horrible and abhorrent, and unversioned libraries shouldn't > ever happen, and other packages shouldn't start depending on them and > icky icky icky icky ewww. Maybe I'm just being simple, but couldn't one simply modify the binary to inc

Bug#42236: shlibs without a version (was Re: weekly policy summary)

1999-08-07 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 03:46:34PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > Method for shlibs to work with libfoo.so (#42236) > * Under discussion. > * Proposed by Joseph Carter. > * This is a proposal to make binary-only shared libs that have no > soname work with dpkh-shlibdeps. The idea is to detect