Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 05 Jul 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Here's a slightly modified version of Guillem's patch that makes fewer
>> assumptions about the structure of the debian/rules file in the example
>> and doesn't refer to a non-mandatory target (install). Sec
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Here's a slightly modified version of Guillem's patch that makes fewer
> assumptions about the structure of the debian/rules file in the example
> and doesn't refer to a non-mandatory target (install). Seconds?
Seconded.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Le
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 14:01:26 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'd like to propose to formalize a new option («nocheck») in
> > DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS to make the build skip running any test-suites.
> >
> > This helps for example when doing iterations of pat
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to propose to formalize a new option («nocheck») in
> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS to make the build skip running any test-suites.
>
> This helps for example when doing iterations of patching, building
> and testing, until you want to do the final build.
>
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.2.2
Severity: wishlist
I'd like to propose to formalize a new option («nocheck») in
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS to make the build skip running any test-suites.
This helps for example when doing iterations of patching, building
and testing, until you want to do the final
5 matches
Mail list logo
