On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > You started this proposal, so why don't you simply bring it to a
> > good end? I'll support your intension...
> So I'd like some advice. The whole policy about /etc/rc?.d fails
> immediately when file-rc is being used. So should I actually propose
> a
[Cc'd to -policy for comments.]
> > > So I (as the actual maintainer of file-rc) second your proposal, to
> > > change the policy in a way, that forbids to create the symlinks in a
> > > way different to update-rc.d.
> >
> > Should I undertake to propose a revised wording or would you like to?
>
> So I (as the actual maintainer of file-rc) second your proposal, to
> change the policy in a way, that forbids to create the symlinks in a
> way different to update-rc.d.
Should I undertake to propose a revised wording or would you like to?
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On Sun, 18 Jul 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Section 3.3 currently makes reference to /etc/rc?.d as containing
> symlinks to the scripts in /etc/init.d, and a detailed description of
> how init uses them. It goes on, in section 3.3.3, to say:
> A program is provided, `update-rc.d', to make it ea
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.0.0.0
Severity: wishlist
Section 3.3 currently makes reference to /etc/rc?.d as containing
symlinks to the scripts in /etc/init.d, and a detailed description of
how init uses them. It goes on, in section 3.3.3, to say:
A program is provided, `update-rc.d', to m
5 matches
Mail list logo
