Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> I suggest to add to the second sentence: ", and that only the postinst
>> script can rely on the package to be configured."
>
> Does the patch in [1] look reasonable?
[...]
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=351;bug=504880
Yes, fine.
Regards, Frank
forcemerge 504880 403649
quit
Hi Frank,
Frank Küster wrote:
> Current Policy says:
>
> , 7.2 Binary Dependencies
> | The Depends field should also be used if the postinst, prerm or
> | postrm scripts require the package to be present in order to
> | run. Note, however, that the postrm cannot
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 06:41:41PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.7.2.1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
> Current Policy says:
> , 7.2 Binary Dependencies
> | The Depends field should also be used if the postinst, prerm or
> | postrm scripts require the pack
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.2.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Current Policy says:
, 7.2 Binary Dependencies
| The Depends field should also be used if the postinst, prerm or
| postrm scripts require the package to be present in order to
| run. Note, however, that the postrm cannot rel
4 matches
Mail list logo
