Bug#374029: Build-Depends{,-Indep} as defined is not useful and not followed

2012-09-03 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 12:05:56PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Bill Allombert writes: > > > The problematic hook is the following: > > > + This split allows binary-only builds to not install the > > + dependencies required for the build-indep > > +

Bug#374029: Build-Depends{,-Indep} as defined is not useful and not followed

2012-09-01 Thread Russ Allbery
Bill Allombert writes: > The problematic hook is the following: > + This split allows binary-only builds to not install the > + dependencies required for the build-indep > + target and skip any resource-intensive build tasks that > +

Bug#374029: Build-Depends{,-Indep} as defined is not useful and not followed

2012-09-01 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Bill Allombert wrote: > + This split allows binary-only builds to not install the > + dependencies required for the build-indep > + target and skip any resource-intensive build tasks that > + are only required when building archi

Bug#374029: Build-Depends{,-Indep} as defined is not useful and not followed

2012-09-01 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 01:33:34AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Bill Allombert writes: > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:31:50AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > >> Russ Allbery writes: > > >>> The following patch implements the decision of the Debian Technical > >>> Committee in #629385 to make build-

Bug#374029: Build-Depends{,-Indep} as defined is not useful and not followed

2012-09-01 Thread Russ Allbery
Bill Allombert writes: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:31:50AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Russ Allbery writes: >>> The following patch implements the decision of the Debian Technical >>> Committee in #629385 to make build-arch and build-indep mandatory. >>> Please review. Note that I'm not look

Bug#374029: Build-Depends{,-Indep} as defined is not useful and not followed

2012-09-01 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:31:50AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Russ Allbery writes: > > > The following patch implements the decision of the Debian Technical > > Committee in #629385 to make build-arch and build-indep mandatory. > > Please review. Note that I'm not looking for conventional seco

Bug#374029: Build-Depends{,-Indep} as defined is not useful and not followed

2012-08-27 Thread Russ Allbery
Russ Allbery writes: > The following patch implements the decision of the Debian Technical > Committee in #629385 to make build-arch and build-indep mandatory. > Please review. Note that I'm not looking for conventional seconds since > the Technical Committee has already made a judgement; rather

Bug#374029: Build-Depends{,-Indep} as defined is not useful and not followed

2012-08-12 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 01:19:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Hello folks, > > The following patch implements the decision of the Debian Technical > Committee in #629385 to make build-arch and build-indep mandatory. Please > review. Note that I'm not looking for conventional seconds since the

Bug#374029: Build-Depends{,-Indep} as defined is not useful and not followed

2012-08-12 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Russ Allbery , 2012-08-12, 13:19: --- a/policy.sgml +++ b/policy.sgml @@ -1987,52 +1987,34 @@ zope. - build-arch (optional), -build-indep (optional) + build-arch (required), +build-indep (required)

Bug#374029: Build-Depends{,-Indep} as defined is not useful and not followed

2012-08-12 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Russ Allbery wrote: > The following patch implements the decision of the Debian Technical > Committee in #629385 to make build-arch and build-indep mandatory. Please > review. Looks good to me. Thanks, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#374029: Build-Depends{,-Indep} as defined is not useful and not followed

2012-08-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Hello folks, The following patch implements the decision of the Debian Technical Committee in #629385 to make build-arch and build-indep mandatory. Please review. Note that I'm not looking for conventional seconds since the Technical Committee has already made a judgement; rather, I'm looking fo