> On Sun, 30 May 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>
> > I checked through the current version of policy, and FSSTND is
> > mentioned in several places. They all appear to be trivially
> > replaceable by the corresponding references to the FHS. [...]
>
> Maybe this is not as easy as it seems at first.
On Sun, 30 May 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I checked through the current version of policy, and FSSTND is
> mentioned in several places. They all appear to be trivially
> replaceable by the corresponding references to the FHS. [...]
Maybe this is not as easy as it seems at first. For example, w
I checked through the current version of policy, and FSSTND is
mentioned in several places. They all appear to be trivially
replaceable by the corresponding references to the FHS. For ease, it
would make sense not to refer to specific sections of the FHS where it
is possible to avoid this; this w
3 matches
Mail list logo