Bug#361137: [PROPOSAL] Make use of invoke-rc.d, if available, mandatory

2006-04-07 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Seconded once more. Fourthed (counting Russ second) signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#361137: [PROPOSAL] Make use of invoke-rc.d, if available, mandatory

2006-04-06 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Joey Hess said: > Seconded once more. That would be thirded, wouldn't it? I'll fourth it. -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :

Bug#361137: [PROPOSAL] Make use of invoke-rc.d, if available, mandatory

2006-04-06 Thread Joey Hess
Seconded once more. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#361137: [PROPOSAL] Make use of invoke-rc.d, if available, mandatory

2006-04-06 Thread Russ Allbery
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: debian-policy > Severity: wishlist > Given that the initial reactions to this were uniformly positive, I'll > need to actually start following procedure and use the BTS. > The formal proposal is to change 9.3.3.2 ("Running initscripts"), seco

Bug#361137: [PROPOSAL] Make use of invoke-rc.d, if available, mandatory

2006-04-06 Thread Lars Wirzenius
Package: debian-policy Severity: wishlist Given that the initial reactions to this were uniformly positive, I'll need to actually start following procedure and use the BTS. The formal proposal is to change 9.3.3.2 ("Running initscripts"), second paragraph, from this: The use of invoke-rc