On Monday 30 January 2006 13:17, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> > On Sunday 29 January 2006 02:36, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I object to b) being in policy. The file /etc/profile is not a file
> which two or more packages need to be able to modify.
>
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Sunday 29 January 2006 02:36, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > +Sometimes two or more packgages need to be able to modify
> > the +same configuration file. One such case is were related
> > packages +share a co
On Sunday 29 January 2006 02:36, Santiago Vila wrote:
> +Sometimes two or more packgages need to be able to modify
> the +same configuration file. One such case is were related
> packages +share a configuration file (e.g. bash and other
> bourn compatible +
+Sometimes two or more packgages need to be able to modify the
+same configuration file. One such case is were related packages
+share a configuration file (e.g. bash and other bourn compatible
+shells share /etc/profile).
You are implicitly saying t
4 matches
Mail list logo