Your message dated Wed, 2 Aug 2000 15:17:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closed in debian-policy 3.2.0.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 10:16:05PM -0700, Joel Klecker wrote:
> It's also been suggested that --rename is potentially harmful.
--rename would be harmful if the divert target would be the /bin/sh
symlink. [Or some other target which is critical to system integrity.]
In almost all other circumstan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 29522
Bug#29522: [PROPOSED]: clarification needed about diversions
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
reopen 29522
thanks
No, I can tell you from recent experience that the packaging manual's
example for diversions is wrong.
The postrm example is correct, but the preinst one isn't.
The preinst should be:
if [ install = "$1" -o upgrade = "$1" ]; then
dpkg-divert --package
Your message dated Tue, 26 Oct 1999 15:57:20 +0100 (BST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#29522: diversions
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
5 matches
Mail list logo
