On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:21:57 -0700, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I agree with Manoj's suggestion. The best way to go about it would be to
> draft a complete proposal (including standardizing the output format), start
> patching packages in unstable, and go from there.
Please see th
I agree with Manoj's suggestion. The best way to go about it would be to
draft a complete proposal (including standardizing the output format), start
patching packages in unstable, and go from there.
FWIW, I think it would be appropriate to add an option to start-stop-daemon
to support this use c
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:24:56 +0200, Bill Allombert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> I think rather than trying to decree a policy, and over engineer an
>> optional action for an init script meant mostly for user
>> consumption, we should let the developers come up with whatever
>> works best for the
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 04:10:53PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:57:35 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:30:55AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> > wrote:
> >> --- policy.sgml.orig 2005-01-19 01:10:37.0 +0100
> >> +++ pol
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:57:35 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:30:55AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
>> --- policy.sgml.orig 2005-01-19 01:10:37.0 +0100
>> +++ policy.sgml 2005-01-19 01:13:05.0 +0100
>> @@ -5392,13 +5392,17 @@ force-
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:30:55AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
wrote:
> --- policy.sgml.orig 2005-01-19 01:10:37.0 +0100
> +++ policy.sgml 2005-01-19 01:13:05.0 +0100
> @@ -5392,13 +5392,17 @@
> force-reload
> cause the configuration to be r
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 11:34:24PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:56:57PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> >
> > "/etc/init.d/foo start" should exit with a nonzero status if foo failed
> > to start. Unfortunately this status isn't conveyed to the user, as you
> > say.
>
> T
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:56:57PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
>
> "/etc/init.d/foo start" should exit with a nonzero status if foo failed
> to start. Unfortunately this status isn't conveyed to the user, as you
> say.
That is not exactly true: See 9.4. Console messages from `init.d' scripts
In p
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:00:18 +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
wrote:
> I would like a new option to be added to init.d scripts: 'status'
> which basicly tells what status is the service currently in
> (either running or dead).
This wish combines nicely with the wish that initscripts implem
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.6.1.1
Priority: wishlist
Tags: patch
[ Note: I understand that this status suggestion is covered (without a
valid example in #208010) but I believe that LSB compliance also forces
some other things (like exit codes) which is still under discussion.
That's why I'm
10 matches
Mail list logo
