On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 08:18:33AM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En ce milieu de nuit ?toil?e du vendredi 21 novembre 2008, vers
> 03:19, Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
>
> >> Is there some way to easily retrieve all postinst scripts to check how
> >> adduser is called?
Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Here is the list of package that name the user with the name of the
> source package:
- vdr:vdr
Tobias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OoO En ce doux début de matinée du vendredi 21 novembre 2008, vers
08:18, je disais:
> And the ones that uses a prefix:
> - exim4: Debian-exim
> - lldpd: _lldpd
I have missed console-log and Debian-console-log. I suppose that this is
because it is arch-indep.
--
BOFH excuse #433:
error: on
On 2008-11-21 08:18 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Here is the list of package that name the user with the name of the
> source package:
> [...]
> - zabbix: zabbix
- postfix: postfix
- dictd: dictd
> And the ones that uses a prefix:
> - exim4: Debian-exim
> - lldpd: _lldpd
- xf
OoO En ce milieu de nuit étoilée du vendredi 21 novembre 2008, vers
03:19, Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
>> Is there some way to easily retrieve all postinst scripts to check how
>> adduser is called?
> Yup, take a look at lintian.debian.org's lab in gluck.
> It only conta
This one time, at band camp, Vincent Bernat said:
> Is there some way to easily retrieve all postinst scripts to check how
> adduser is called?
adduser largely exists to be a policy compliant framework for maintainer
script user manipulation. If policy changes, adduser will too. The
major pain
OoO En ce doux début de matinée du samedi 15 novembre 2008, vers 08:49,
je disais:
> ,[ http://wiki.debian.org/AccountHandlingInMaintainerScripts ]
> | A collision free way to name system accounts should really be mentioned
> | in Debian policy to stop this uncontrolled growth of different m
7 matches
Mail list logo
