On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 07:32:30PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > Packages using debhelper appear to still use /etc/init.d directly.
> Not really:
Yeah, sorry - I appear to have managed to pick on an older package to
check against.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it,
On 30.12.03 17:50 Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 10:18:18AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Dan Jacobson wrote:
not restart the services on package upgrades. Broken ones still calling
/etc/init.d/whatever directly will, but that's a bug: report it wh
> > not restart the services on package upgrades. Broken ones still calling
> > /etc/init.d/whatever directly will, but that's a bug: report it whenever you
> > find one of these packages.
>
> Packages using debhelper appear to still use /etc/init.d directly.
They will not use /etc/init.d when i
Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 10:18:18AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Dan Jacobson wrote:
>
> > not restart the services on package upgrades. Broken ones still calling
> > /etc/init.d/whatever directly will, but that's a bug: report it whenever
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 10:18:18AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> not restart the services on package upgrades. Broken ones still calling
> /etc/init.d/whatever directly will, but that's a bug: report it whenever you
> find one of these pack
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Debian should no longer be like some mere arcade kiddie game machine,
> where if you don't like the games staring when you deposit your coin,
> then sorry.
It is not anymore. This has been fixed by invoke-rc.d. All that remains
now is to give users an e
6 matches
Mail list logo
