On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Chris Cheney wrote:
> What needs to happen to get this into policy?
Nothing. It is not possible to support this. I attempted to in a dpkg upload
recently. It broke completely. I had to back it out.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 12:58:19AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> So I come up with a different proposal:
> Introducing a new file, say debian/rules.version.
> If this file does not exist, we declare that version=0,
> else version=`cat debian/rules.version`.
Yes, yes, yes! What an elegant solutio
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:56:10PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 11:09:23AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > dpkg-buildpackage and policy over. Note that it will break in pretty
> > > much the same way as #216492 (subject of this thread) if the rules
> > > file has not b
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 11:09:23AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > dpkg-buildpackage and policy over. Note that it will break in pretty
> > much the same way as #216492 (subject of this thread) if the rules
> > file has not been converted to your scheme.
>
> It will not break anything:
>
> 1) ol
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Buildd do build packages as root, AFAIK
>>
>> They don't. I don't think any of them do.
>
> AFAIK, all of them do. Some packages can't be built with fakeroot, but
> must be built with sudo; to avoid having to build some packages twice,
> we build e
Op wo 22-10-2003, om 07:22 schreef Andrew Suffield:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 06:32:42PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:30:52PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > > The defect is that build-indep is made as root. The advantage over
> > > > Andrew solution is to not ma
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 06:22:38AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Here a refinement the proposal in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Add at the top of debian/rules
> >
> > BUILD=build-arch build-indep
> >
> > and changes build target to depend on
> >
> > build: $(BUILD)
> >
> > At this poin
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 06:32:42PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:30:52PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > The defect is that build-indep is made as root. The advantage over
> > > Andrew solution is to not make build-arch as root.
> >
> > We haven't built packages as
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:30:52PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > The defect is that build-indep is made as root. The advantage over
> > Andrew solution is to not make build-arch as root.
>
> We haven't built packages as root for years. This argument seems
> pretty irrelevant.
Buildd do build
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:24:19AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:15:17AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 08:15:43PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:20:39PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > Other people have cov
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:15:17AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 08:15:43PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:20:39PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > Other people have covered why this breaks. Here's the solution I use:
> >
> > Make your buil
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:15:17AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
> What needs to happen to get this into policy?
The usual - see /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy-process.html
(or .txt.gz or .sgml.gz) for details.
--
Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra-osis is too long
[EMAIL PROTEC
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 08:15:43PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:20:39PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 09:51, Adam Conrad wrote:
> >
> > > Package: libtool
> > > Version: 1.5-3
> > > Severity: serious
> > >
> > > libtool fails to build fr
13 matches
Mail list logo
