Bug#20373: PROPOSED] shouldn't start init scripts in wrong runlevel

1999-05-31 Thread Edward Betts
On policy, Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What about the ordering in /etc/rc?.d is it important, should we not be > > restarting stuff out of order? > > I would guess not; these are not facilities being restarted but newly > installed ones. If there is a desperate problem with this,

Bug#20373: PROPOSED] shouldn't start init scripts in wrong runlevel

1999-05-31 Thread Julian Gilbey
> On policy, Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > (That is, we should check whether /etc/rcN.d/{S,K}??script exists > > > where N is the current runlevel and start or stop the script > > > appropriately if it does -- see the rest of this bugreport for > > > details.) > > > > > > I sec

Bug#20373: PROPOSED] shouldn't start init scripts in wrong runlevel

1999-05-30 Thread Edward Betts
On policy, Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (That is, we should check whether /etc/rcN.d/{S,K}??script exists > > where N is the current runlevel and start or stop the script > > appropriately if it does -- see the rest of this bugreport for > > details.) > > > > I second this propo

Bug#20373: PROPOSED] shouldn't start init scripts in wrong runlevel

1999-05-30 Thread Piotr Roszatycki
> > [debhelper] should check whether the corresponding file exists under > > /etc/rc?.d before starting them in postinst or stopping them in postrm. > > (That is, we should check whether /etc/rcN.d/{S,K}??script exists > where N is the current runlevel and start or stop the script > appropriately

Bug#20373: PROPOSED] shouldn't start init scripts in wrong runlevel

1999-05-30 Thread Julian Gilbey
> [debhelper] should check whether the corresponding file exists under > /etc/rc?.d before starting them in postinst or stopping them in postrm. (That is, we should check whether /etc/rcN.d/{S,K}??script exists where N is the current runlevel and start or stop the script appropriately if it does -