On Thu, 18 Sep 1997, Joey Hess wrote:
> Christian Schwarz wrote:
> > Do you see an easy way to write such a debstd replacement which just
> > prints the commands to stdout? I had a short look at debstd but I don't
> > see an easy solution right now.
>
> Have you tried running "sh -v /usr/bin/debs
On Thu, 18 Sep 1997, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote:
>
> >As it was not really a bug, I didn't report a bug report--but you're
> >right, I probably should have done this either way.
> >
> >If I recall right, the problem was that debstd inserted calls to
>
On Tue, 16 Sep 1997, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> : I must say I like debmake for small packaging up small and easy packages.
>
> : However, I ran into big problems with using debstd in the large and
> : complicated mysql package. (For example, debstd inserts commands in the
> : postinst script whi
Christian Schwarz wrote:
> Do you see an easy way to write such a debstd replacement which just
> prints the commands to stdout? I had a short look at debstd but I don't
> see an easy solution right now.
Have you tried running "sh -v /usr/bin/debstd" ? That should output what
it's doing.
--
see
On Thu, 18 Sep 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote:
>As it was not really a bug, I didn't report a bug report--but you're
>right, I probably should have done this either way.
>
>If I recall right, the problem was that debstd inserted calls to
>"update-rc.d" and "/etc/init.d/foo start" to the postinst sc
: I must say I like debmake for small packaging up small and easy packages.
: However, I ran into big problems with using debstd in the large and
: complicated mysql package. (For example, debstd inserts commands in the
: postinst script which can not be turned of easily.)
I wish I would have got
> I must say I like debmake for small packaging up small and easy packages.
Same here.
> That's why I'd
> like to have a replacement for debstd with the same functionality except
> that it does not execute anything, but outputs the commands that it would
> execute (in a way they can be included
On Mon, 15 Sep 1997, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 1997, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> > >In fact, I'm considering to remove debstd from all my packages if you
> > >insist on not changing debmake.
> >
> Santiago, I would encourage you to do so anyway. As far as I know debmake
> has not beco
8 matches
Mail list logo
