Hi,
Quoting Helmut Grohne (2022-10-05 20:08:19)
> I think this text is already quite good. I am yet wondering about the scope
> of support that we mention here.
>
> 1. You write that we want essential + build-essential. In practice, we
>also want things such as apt or systemd. I am wondering
Hi Joshannes,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 02:35:30PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
>To enable creating a foreign architecture Debian chroot during the early
>bootstrap of a new Debian architecture, maintainer scripts and utilities
>called by maintainer scripts of packages
Hi Russ,
thank you for your explanations, things are quite a bit clearer now.
Quoting Russ Allbery (2022-09-20 05:47:45)
> The point of putting this in Policy is to provide guidance to the
> packagers, not to the bootstrappers. Presumably you already have other
> documentation that you maintain
Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes:
> * where to document this? Other variables set for maintainer scripts
>like DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_PACKAGE or DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_ARCH do not seem to
>be documented either even though (according to codesearch.d.n) they
>are used in hundreds of places
Source: debian-policy
Version: 4.6.1.1
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-d...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: dpkg-root-support
X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org, debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
in [1] Russ asked us to submit a policy bug about DPKG_ROOT so here it
goes. :)
[1] https://lists.debian.org/
5 matches
Mail list logo
