On Sat, 01 Jun 2002, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > Do please notice we have (at least) *TWO* classes of arch identification
> > strings. What RMS seems to be asking us to do is to change all of them to
> > have '-gnu'. That is *NOT* what I am talking about.
>
> Actually, RMS is concerned about the
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:49:47AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Ben Collins writes:
> > > Just a heads up on what is about to happen. RMS is complaining that we
> > > use "-linux" instead of "-linux-gnu". I know there's a lot of
>
> Great. Now I might have a hell of a time to get
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 23:49, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> For MY sake as the autotools-dev maintainer, and for the sake of future
> cross-building setups we might need, please change DEB_*GNU_TYPE to return
> the proper names, which happen to be postfixed by -gnu. Bugs to this effect
> ha
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Ok, now that we separate woody and unstable, it is time to think about
> this. IMO, this is not a gcc only thing. So propably it should be
> changed in dpkg/policy first. debian--linux-gnu and
> -linux-gnu come to mind as an alternative.
>
> Ben Collins
On Wed, 29 May 2002 23:56:11 +0200,
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, now that we separate woody and unstable, it is time to think about
> this. IMO, this is not a gcc only thing. So propably it should be
> changed in dpkg/policy first. debian--linux-gnu and
> -linux-gnu come to mind
What is an architecture string, anyway?
How does one refer to Debian GNU/Hurd?
How does one refer to Mastadon GNU/BSD?
How does one refer to Darwin GNU/Mach?
If someone can tell me the answer to those questions, I may be able to
supply intelligent comments on the issue. In the meantime, consi
On May 29, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Ok, now that we separate woody and unstable, it is time to think about
> this. IMO, this is not a gcc only thing. So propably it should be
> changed in dpkg/policy first. debian--linux-gnu and
> -linux-gnu come to mind as an alternative.
IMHO this would be a non-
Ok, now that we separate woody and unstable, it is time to think about
this. IMO, this is not a gcc only thing. So propably it should be
changed in dpkg/policy first. debian--linux-gnu and
-linux-gnu come to mind as an alternative.
Ben Collins writes:
> Just a heads up on what is about to happen.
8 matches
Mail list logo
