On Wed, Apr 01, 1998 at 11:01:30AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> X11R6.4 has been released. You need to pay $$$ to get hold of
> it, as far as I can see. For the free software community X is
> moribund, and it is time to move on. (What to, I wonder?)
Wasn't Berlin intended to be an X-su
On Wed, Apr 01, 1998 at 09:22:29AM -0500, Brian Mays wrote:
> Where should the links in /etc/alternatives point for X applications?
> Should they point to /usr/bin/X11/app-name or /usr/X11R6/bin/app-name?
> I can find nothing in Debian's policy manual that addresses this issue,
> and there currentl
Hi,
X11R6.4 has been released. You need to pay $$$ to get hold of
it, as far as I can see. For the free software community X is
moribund, and it is time to move on. (What to, I wonder?)
manoj
--
"Science is about skepticism." -- Eugene Miya
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Apr 01, 1998 at 09:22:29AM -0500, Brian Mays wrote:
> It is my opinion that the alternatives link should be through
> /usr/bin/X11; otherwise when X is upgraded to X11R7, all of the
> alternatives will break. However, I would like to hear what others think.
There may never be an X11R7, b
Where should the links in /etc/alternatives point for X applications?
Should they point to /usr/bin/X11/app-name or /usr/X11R6/bin/app-name?
I can find nothing in Debian's policy manual that addresses this issue,
and there currently are at least two open bug reports (20407 and 20409)
on this.
It i
5 matches
Mail list logo
