Kirk Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For instance, the make-doc package (documentation for make, not a
> package for making documentation) is in section doc even though the
> make package itself is in section devel, but over three quarters of
> the other *-doc packages are in the same secti
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I feel is missing is official guidelines for was belongs to what
> section.
I would love to see this documented.
For instance, the make-doc package (documentation for make, not a
package for making documentation) is in section doc even though the
m
Alex Yukhimets wrote:
>> I just noticed that 2 similar apps (cbb and xacc) were placed in 2
>> different sections (misc and utils). I filed a bug against ftp.deb
>> for this, but without suggesting a solution.
>
>Hi.
>
>Same thing with databases - they all are placed in diferent sect
> I just noticed that 2 similar apps (cbb and xacc) were placed in 2
> different sections (misc and utils). I filed a bug against ftp.deb
> for this, but without suggesting a solution.
Hi.
Same thing with databases - they all are placed in diferent sections.
May be we should create a separate s
I just noticed that 2 similar apps (cbb and xacc) were placed in 2
different sections (misc and utils). I filed a bug against ftp.deb
for this, but without suggesting a solution.
What I feel is missing is official guidelines for was belongs to what
section. As the sections seem to be defined by
5 matches
Mail list logo
