On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 05:57:38PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> I just got this on the vim-dev list. If this is indeed so (strip does
> not work on s390) does that mean Debian policy forces us to have
> large unstripped binaries on s390?
Debian policy currently recommends that you only compi
> I just got this on the vim-dev list. If this is indeed so (strip does
> not work on s390) does that mean Debian policy forces us to have
> large unstripped binaries on s390?
I think there is a mix-up between z/OS (and OS/390) and Linux/390
in this discussion. 'strip' works just fine on Li
When I refer to s390, I mean OS/390 or z/OS. My work environment is Unix
System Services on a IBM eServer zSeries mainframe. I am NOT working in
390/Linux.
As I said before, strip(1) in OS/390 is equivalent to touch(1).
Sorry for the confusion.
Anthony Giorgio
DBX Developer
Phone: (845) 435-
Previously Gerhard Tonn wrote:
> He is not talking about Linux, but a certain flavor of UNIX that is running
> on top of z/OS formerly called OS/390 formerly called MVS.
D'oh, should have noticed that :(
Wichert.
--
_
/ N
On Wednesday 19 September 2001 17:57, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> I just got this on the vim-dev list. If this is indeed so (strip does
> not work on s390) does that mean Debian policy forces us to have
> large unstripped binaries on s390?
>
> Wichert.
>
Strip works fine on s390. Most binaries in the
I just got this on the vim-dev list. If this is indeed so (strip does
not work on s390) does that mean Debian policy forces us to have
large unstripped binaries on s390?
Wichert.
- Forwarded message from Anthony Giorgio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: "Anthony Giorgio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
6 matches
Mail list logo
