Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This brings up another issue about rule datasets: namespaces and
> name collisions. How should rule entities be named, in order to
> minimize conflict?
> We can try using clever abbreviations of the rule title, but
> that seems a
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:33:17 +0100, Giacomo A Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:10:33 +, Ian Jackson
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>>> Manoj Srivastava writes ("[Policy-rewrite]: Determi
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:10:33 +, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Manoj Srivastava writes ("[Policy-rewrite]: Determining distinct
policy rules"):
While we are all pondering the new policy draft format, the next step
to be taken are looking a
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:10:33 +, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava writes ("[Policy-rewrite]: Determining distinct
> policy rules"):
>> While we are all pondering the new policy draft format, the next step
>> to be taken are looking
Manoj Srivastava writes ("[Policy-rewrite]: Determining distinct policy rules"):
> While we are all pondering the new policy draft format, the next
> step to be taken are looking at current policy, and determining what
> are the distinct rules; and what are the norm
Hi,
While we are all pondering the new policy draft format, the next
step to be taken are looking at current policy, and determining what
are the distinct rules; and what are the normative parts in that rule.
With new additions to policy, determining what constitutes a
rule is
6 matches
Mail list logo
