> I'd like to re-open discussion on a proposal I made some time ago. The
> current policy on the setting of "cgi-bin" tends to interfere with how most
> webmasters set up their sites. Most people setting up a web site expect
> /cgi-bin/ to be available for scripts on their site. Unfortunately, D
> > As such, I think Debian's system should be altered a bit. I recommend using
> > instead the name "/cgi-lib/" for scripts under /usr/lib/cgi-bin/. This
> > will keep both features independant and not affect the general use of
> > the system.
> >
> > More information about this as well as some
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 10:33:55AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> As such, I think Debian's system should be altered a bit. I recommend using
> instead the name "/cgi-lib/" for scripts under /usr/lib/cgi-bin/. This
> will keep both features independant and not affect the general use of
> the system.
I'd like to re-open discussion on a proposal I made some time ago. The
current policy on the setting of "cgi-bin" tends to interfere with how most
webmasters set up their sites. Most people setting up a web site expect
/cgi-bin/ to be available for scripts on their site. Unfortunately, Debian
u
4 matches
Mail list logo
