On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 01:10:44PM -0300, Julio wrote:
> Given the comments on my proposal, I'm rewriting it to the following:
>
> 1. to provide support for separation of local initialization scripts,
> allow update-rc.d to handle subdirectories. So, a /etc/init.d/local (or
> whatever) dir could b
Julio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Given the comments on my proposal, I'm rewriting it to the following:
>
> 1. to provide support for separation of local initialization
> scripts, allow update-rc.d to handle subdirectories. So, a
> /etc/init.d/local (or whatever) dir could be created and a scri
[Please wrap your lines at 72 characters!]
> Given the comments on my proposal, I'm rewriting it to the following:
>
> 1. to provide support for separation of local initialization
> scripts, allow update-rc.d to handle subdirectories. So, a
> /etc/init.d/local (or whatever) dir could be created a
Given the comments on my proposal, I'm rewriting it to the following:
1. to provide support for separation of local initialization scripts, allow
update-rc.d to handle subdirectories. So, a /etc/init.d/local (or whatever) dir
could be created and a script within this dir could be linked to rc?.d
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 02:38:58AM +0300, Brock Rozen wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 at 02:00, julio wrote about "Re: [PROPOSAL]
> Directories...":
>
> > > 0 * * * * generate_web_stats
> > > @reboot eggdrop
> > >
> > > That second line (I think I got it right), is valid in a crontab file and
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 at 02:00, julio wrote about "Re: [PROPOSAL] Directories...":
> > 0 * * * * generate_web_stats
> > @reboot eggdrop
> >
> > That second line (I think I got it right), is valid in a crontab file and
> > makes the job be run on reboot. (This is documented only in the cron so
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 09:22:38PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Julio wrote:
> > init scritps, I'd like to propose the creation of a mechanism to handle
> > user init scripts. Some users actually need to have persistent processes
> > between reboots, and using similar functionalities for the system in
Julio wrote:
> init scritps, I'd like to propose the creation of a mechanism to handle
> user init scripts. Some users actually need to have persistent processes
> between reboots, and using similar functionalities for the system init
> mechanisms could be interesting.
0 * * * * generate_web
Still regarding my proposal for the creation of a directory to place local
init scritps, I'd like to propose the creation of a mechanism to handle
user init scripts. Some users actually need to have persistent processes
between reboots, and using similar functionalities for the system init
mechani
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Julio wrote:
> > Add a directory /etc/init.local (or maybe /etc/init.d.local?)
> > for locally installed init scripts, which can be handled by
> > update-rc.d like the script in /etc/init.d.
> >Okay, with this proposal I have less problems than with the initial
> >one,
At 10:22 AM 8/17/99 +0200, you wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Julio wrote:
> >I don't see why there should be any discrimination of local init
> >scripts, which only can be executed in rcS.d or after all other
> >scripts. This is a restriction which isn't necessary and doesn't
> >make sense.
> I a
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Julio wrote:
> >I don't see why there should be any discrimination of local init
> >scripts, which only can be executed in rcS.d or after all other
> >scripts. This is a restriction which isn't necessary and doesn't
> >make sense.
> I agree. However, I've mentioned this as a
At 01:00 AM 8/16/99 +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
On Sun, 15 Aug 1999, Julio wrote:
> > > I propose the creation of some directories to hold the local
> > > initialization scripts and separate them from the initialization
> > > scripts installed by packages. One possible approach would be to
>
Julio> To accommodate local initialization scripts in Debian, one must
Julio> add these scripts in /etc/init.d and update-rc.d. Thus scripts
Julio> installed by packages and local scripts to share the same
Julio> directories.
Why is this method a problem?
--
Gilbert Laycock em
On Sun, 15 Aug 1999, Julio wrote:
> > > I propose the creation of some directories to hold the local
> > > initialization scripts and separate them from the initialization
> > > scripts installed by packages. One possible approach would be to
> > > use /usr/local/etc/init.d or /etc/rc.local to con
On Sat, Aug 14, 1999 at 06:20:04PM -0300, Julio wrote:
> I propose the creation of some directories to hold the local initialization
> scripts and separate them from the initialization scripts installed by
> packages. One possible approach would be to use /usr/local/etc/init.d or
> /etc/rc.local
At 06:02 PM 8/15/99 +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Julio wrote:
> To accommodate local initialization scripts in Debian, one must add
> these scripts in /etc/init.d and update-rc.d. Thus scripts installed
> by packages and local scripts to share the same directories.
I don'
On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Julio wrote:
> To accommodate local initialization scripts in Debian, one must add
> these scripts in /etc/init.d and update-rc.d. Thus scripts installed
> by packages and local scripts to share the same directories.
I don't think that is really a problem. Having two differe
On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Julio wrote:
> To accommodate local initialization scripts in Debian, one must add these
> scripts in /etc/init.d and update-rc.d. Thus scripts installed by packages
> and local scripts to share the same directories.
>
> I propose the creation of some directories to hold th
To accommodate local initialization scripts in Debian, one must add these
scripts in /etc/init.d and update-rc.d. Thus scripts installed by packages
and local scripts to share the same directories.
I propose the creation of some directories to hold the local initialization
scripts and separate
20 matches
Mail list logo
