Re: [PATCH 1/1] Better document version ranking and 0

2008-05-01 Thread Clint Adams
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 03:10:19PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > sensible_editor ./debian/changelog # add in ./debian/changes/ You may find it helpful to do a "git dch" before this. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Better document version ranking and 0

2008-04-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> sensible_editor ./debian/changelog # add in ./debian/changes/ >> <> >> git tag -s v3.8.0.0 >> git push origin >> --8<---cut here---end--->8--- > > Yup, that looks right fo

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Better document version ranking and 0

2008-04-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We can adopt a policy of recording the proposer and seconder of > an change in ./debian/changelog; as well as the commit message; since > really, unlike code, wording proposal and review are integral to good > policy development, and people

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Better document version ranking and 0

2008-04-30 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:22:53 -0700, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I think the new commit goes on the branch, logically speaking, since >> it is part of getting the branch ready. And we really have two >> seconders sending in an ack, and w

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Better document version ranking and 0

2008-04-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think the new commit goes on the branch, logically speaking, > since it is part of getting the branch ready. And we really have two > seconders sending in an ack, and we can record them separately, unless > they come in close together. In

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Better document version ranking and 0

2008-04-30 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:35:33 -0700, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:10:41 -0700, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> said: >>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The following patch, from branch bug458

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Better document version ranking and 0

2008-04-29 Thread Russ Allbery
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:10:41 -0700, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> The following patch, from branch bug458910-rra, looks good to me. >> That's two seconds, so I should merge it. Is there s

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Better document version ranking and 0

2008-04-29 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:10:41 -0700, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The following patch, from branch bug458910-rra, looks good to me. > That's two seconds, so I should merge it. Is there some way that I > can include the Acked-by informat

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Better document version ranking and 0

2008-04-29 Thread Russ Allbery
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The following patch, from branch bug458910-rra, looks good to > me. That's two seconds, so I should merge it. Is there some way that I can include the Acked-by information in a merge when I do the merge? Hm, actually, I'm guessing probably

[PATCH 1/1] Better document version ranking and 0

2008-04-29 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, The following patch, from branch bug458910-rra, looks good to me. manoj > Document that an empty Debian revision is equivalent to a Debian > revision of 0 and clarify the way version numbers are compared. Thanks > to Raphael Hertzog for information about what dpkg does. Ac