if we give /usr/X11R6 it's own hirarchy, why don't we do everything to
there ? and where should we stop ?
examples :
- /var knows no X11R6
- we have our doc files in /usr/doc, not in /usr/X11R6/doc
new fhs draft will make some things different :
/usr/share takes many files : doc, man, locale
On Tue, 23 Sep 1997, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Wait. Three cases:
[... snip ...]
> It makes sense to me. Then if you are not running X, you can remove
> /usr/X11R6/bin from your PATH.
Zactly. Keeps your path (and in the case of tcsh or
bash, your hashed-list-of-commands-in-path) from becom
Will Lowe wrote:
> Wait. Three cases:
>
> 1) Something that runs *without* X (eg. on console)
> goes in /usr/bin
> 2) Something that runs *only* in X (eg. Gimp, KDE, rxvt)
> goes in /usr/X11*
> 3) a) Something that works either way (Xemacs, clisp) but is only *one*
> binary (
On Wed, 24 Sep 1997, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> my opinion : /usr/X11* exists for historic reasons. the x11 system (in
> our case xfree86) and related files (e.g. window manager) should go into
> /usr/X11R6. but i see no need to place everything in there, only because
> it needs x11.
Wait. Thr
4 matches
Mail list logo
