Bug#830562: developers-reference: Document expectations & best practices for including AppArmor policy in packages

2016-07-09 Thread intrigeri
the kernel via postinst can surely be made generic enough to fit into the Policy's scope. OTOH the whole thing is really just a few paragraphs, so splitting it over several documents might be overkill. Advice would be welcome, but I can draft the text first and then we'll see where it fits best. Cheers, -- intrigeri

Bug#754744: Bug#702030: Bug#754744: forbid most packages to depend on or recommend apparmor

2014-07-14 Thread intrigeri
ed in policy, at least at this point. Full ACK, we're not there yet. I suggest we drop 754744@ from the Cc list on next reply. Cheers, -- intrigeri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/85sim36eyu@boum.org