On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 08:23:02PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 10:50:36AM -0600, Taral wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:07:19PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:48:32AM -0600, Taral wrote:
> > > > which is really a system dependent th
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:39:56PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 10:38:53PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> >
> > So - reassigning the lintian bug about this to policy.
> >
> > Am I right in taking from the above that /usr/${arch} is essentially a
> > miniature mirror o
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 10:52:54AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >What workable alternative would there be to using
> >/usr[/local]//(bin|lib|include)?
> /usr/lib//...
So just to make sure by example:
/usr/lib/sparc-linux/bin/
...
nm
ranlib
ar
as
ld
...
/
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:49:01PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> lintian currently emits a tag for cross-compilers because they make a
> directory
> in /usr's top level for TARGET i.e. /usr/m68k-linux.
>
> The FHS states:
>
> No large software packages should use a direct subdirectory unde
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:42:22PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>"Jakob" == Jakob Bøhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Jakob> no-source (example: Netscape, opera)
> > Jakob> no-commercial-use (example: zyxel)
> > Jakob> payment-required (example: ope
5 matches
Mail list logo