Re: parallel build options in source packages

2001-03-30 Thread idalton
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 08:23:02PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 10:50:36AM -0600, Taral wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:07:19PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:48:32AM -0600, Taral wrote: > > > > which is really a system dependent th

Re: seeking resolution to issues I have raised

2001-03-07 Thread idalton
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:39:56PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 10:38:53PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > > > So - reassigning the lintian bug about this to policy. > > > > Am I right in taking from the above that /usr/${arch} is essentially a > > miniature mirror o

Re: proper location for cross-compilers in Debian?

2001-02-03 Thread idalton
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 10:52:54AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Feb 03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >What workable alternative would there be to using > >/usr[/local]//(bin|lib|include)? > /usr/lib//... So just to make sure by example: /usr/lib/sparc-linux/bin/ ... nm ranlib ar as ld ... /

Re: proper location for cross-compilers in Debian?

2001-02-02 Thread idalton
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:49:01PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > lintian currently emits a tag for cross-compilers because they make a > directory > in /usr's top level for TARGET i.e. /usr/m68k-linux. > > The FHS states: > > No large software packages should use a direct subdirectory unde

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive

2001-01-29 Thread idalton
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:42:22PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>"Jakob" == Jakob Bøhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jakob> no-source (example: Netscape, opera) > > Jakob> no-commercial-use (example: zyxel) > > Jakob> payment-required (example: ope