Re: Debian conflicts with FHS on /usr/include/{linux,asm}

1999-07-14 Thread Theodore Y. Ts'o
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 09:17:37 -0400 From: Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ok, but let's take this back into the arena of FHS. I hope that FHS isn't only for naive users. [If FHS intends that distributions cannot support users with multiple kernels I'm going to be very disappoint

Re: Debian conflicts with FHS on /usr/include/{linux,asm}

1999-07-14 Thread Theodore Y. Ts&#x27;o
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 13:28:27 +0200 From: Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> IMHO, any kernel module should be able to accept the path to the version of the kernel tree that it shall be compiled for. This is also important if I have several versions of the kernel, or if I want t

Re: Debian conflicts with FHS on /usr/include/{linux,asm}

1999-07-14 Thread Theodore Y. Ts&#x27;o
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 10:15:42 -0700 From: Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I don't intend to support Debian specific packaging hacks that only work > for Debian, and I suspect that other hardware manufacturers that are > enlightened enough to distribute drivers which are kernel

Re: Debian conflicts with FHS on /usr/include/{linux,asm}

1999-07-13 Thread Theodore Y. Ts&#x27;o
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 15:54:10 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian currently uses a system where one needs the kernel source to compile a modules (like pcmcia) but can compile ANY version of the kernel and pcmcia. make-kpkg looks in the current dir,