Bug#94995: PROPOSAL] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages

2001-05-01 Thread Taral
d will cease to be > >> + present in the future. > >> + > >> + > >> + > >> + > > > >I second this proposal. Looks good to me. I also second this proposal. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please use PGP/GPG encryption to send me mail. "Any technology, no matter how primitive, is magic to those who don't understand it." -- Florence Ambrose pgpBeB91v2AMO.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: compressed binaries in packages, for or against?

2001-04-22 Thread Taral
h don't have sections. (They aren't needed for an executable.) -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please use PGP/GPG encryption to send me mail. "Any technology, no matter how primitive, is magic to those who don't understand it." -- Florence Ambrose pgpnTE9LvrusZ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file

2001-04-01 Thread Taral
not present > and the debian/rulez file is. It should also automatically call the > atention of any lamerz that try to build a package without renaming the > rules file to rulez. It should most certainly be debian/rulz, not rulez. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please use PGP/GPG

Re: parallel build options in source packages

2001-03-30 Thread Taral
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 08:23:02PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote: > Um... how? It only works if debian/rules is a makefile, which is > precisely my point. Policy 5.2: (debian/rules - the main building script) This file must be an executable makefile... -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: parallel build options in source packages

2001-03-30 Thread Taral
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:07:19PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:48:32AM -0600, Taral wrote: > > which is really a system dependent thing. Those builders who want > > parallel builds will invoke debian/rules itself with -j 3. I don't > >

Re: parallel build options in source packages

2001-03-29 Thread Taral
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:43:41PM -0600, Taral wrote: > I've found at least one package that has parallel build options in the > debian/rules file. This is most annoying, to say the least, and possibly > wasteful of buildd resources. Would anyone consider making a policy >

parallel build options in source packages

2001-03-28 Thread Taral
I've found at least one package that has parallel build options in the debian/rules file. This is most annoying, to say the least, and possibly wasteful of buildd resources. Would anyone consider making a policy statement on this reasonable? (Or is there already one?) -- Taral <[EMAIL P

Bug#86507: Progress?

2001-03-10 Thread Taral
What is going to happen with this? It is getting very irritating. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail. "Never ascribe to malice what can as easily be put down to stupidity." pgptTPqxYr0h4.pgp Description: PGP signature