and "desktop" tasks doesn't have GNOME start up with twm.
>
> It looks like a priority increase of 40 would work. Do you want to put
> together a patch?
If that solves the problem, then fine.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
the current release. And this
does not include non-us if you happen to be in the us.
BTW, something similar exist also with the testing script.
Does the testing script verify only the dependencies of a package for it
to enter testing, or also the build-deps ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
solution.
The current situation only makes thing difficult for maintainer wanting to do
multi-binaries.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 10:00:04AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 11:49:27AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:50:49AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Well if i install the 3.3.6 X server, it will read its configuration file
&g
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:50:49AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:27:55AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > Ok, about the X server, but will we maintain two sets of libraries also, or
> > go
> > with the 4.0.1 ones ?
>
> Just the 4.0.1 ones.
&g
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 03:00:04AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 07:59:03AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > I think what you propose is a good solution. I suppose 4.0.1 will be woody's
> > primary X server, will it not ?
>
> I expect it to be
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 12:21:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> As some of you know, highly unstable and experimental 4.0.1 .debs were
> produced on Friday and made available to a few people for testing. These
> things were way broken, but not as badly as I feared. I got some v
ytway. Once this is done he should
only need to type make or ./configure. Or else the way of use the example
should be written in some kind of how_to_use ...
Friendly,
Sven LUTHER
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 02:46:48PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:58:58AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > --
> > if a package contains examples that need to be compiled, they must be in
> > such
>
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 09:22:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:58:58AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > I noticed that various packages include (specially -dev packages) includes
> > examples in the /usr/share/doc/package directory. Often this examples w
d, and only someone who wants to test them will unzip this,
thus using less space in /usr ...
Friendly,
Sven LUTHER
Hello, ...
i don't know if this is the right place to speak about this, so if i am wrong,
please direct me to the right place.
I noticed that various packages include (specially -dev packages) includes
examples in the /usr/share/doc/package directory. Often this examples will
just be copies of th
12 matches
Mail list logo
