Manoj was wrong, you shouldn't be a lawyer, but a fiction writer.
--
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ringworld.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g on here?
If your on some crusade to forego common sense and choose the easiest
way out, follow Manoj's suggestion to find another hobby.
--
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ringworld.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stead.)
--
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ringworld.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. If theres one thing I /HATE/ about rpm is file deps.
Not me personally. I looked at the size (~19kB), and the
feature set, and I saw can see scenarios in which a small network
aware tool would be helpful in diagnosis (low probability ones,
Or recovery from non-local tape dumps.
--
do anything to this namespace.
--
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ringworld.org/
the desire for space travel is a metaphor for escape
like this
post-woody.
--
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ringworld.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So I ran up to him, and the exchange went something like this:
Me: Oh my god! You're Larry Niven!
Him: Oh my god! You're Wil Wheaton!
-Wil Wheaton, in a Slashdot interview
' behind it. But I didn't think we were packaging
the current contents.
Of course, the constitution is in the archive, but I dont think that
prevents anyone from mangling it and giving it out. It isn't a
constitution that *we* as a project will acknowledge as ours.
Get your c
this issue further; however, the Free Software Foundation
> appears to be unwilling to negotiate further on this matter (so please
> don't bother them about it).
>
> I welcome feedback on this proposal, but please read the archives of
> debian-legal as referenced above before respon
ts Free to stay
Current is also a waste of time.
So, the idea is that you either have non-free docs that dont go
electronic, or you have Free docs that are maintainable and highly
available with people buying the book because they want to either
support the author or have a nice bound typeset versi
elines, where as the
License is the focus, and not the contents.
Pehraps lots of docs in main will be affected, but do we want to
deticate space and bandwidth to non-free licensing, or does the cabal of
publishing ideas limit us to thinking of documentation as Free?
--
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTE
ome packages.
I think wishlist bugs against the packages that people are worried about
in optional is ok, but to make it policy against all packages as a
'wishlist' bug-like-statement isn't cool.
--
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ringworld.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reas either [a4|letter] would be better 'at
the top' options.
--
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ringworld.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
es. (not per package, but as a all
encompassing thing.)
--
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ringworld.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s littered
with too much information that should really have been kept in
documentation? Or should debconf be expanded into a tool to notify
users of anything about what they are just about to choose/do?
Thanks for any input.
--
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http
14 matches
Mail list logo
