Suppose I split sendmail into two pieces (built from the same source pkg)
1) sendmail(us) whole enchilada (sans TLS support)
2) sendmail-tls(non-us) only new sendmail binary & postinst supporting TLS
Until Debian registers US, I can only dupload the us package.
What will happen whe
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> SASL is not regarded as cryptography. It is merely a module layer, and has
> no real crypto of it's own. IIRC, the libcyrus-sasl in woody does not
> contain any crypto modules. AFA TLS, did you link against libssl09? If
> not, you have nothing to worry abo
I just realized that the sendmail update I made this weekend
8.11.0.Beta1 should probably be removed from its home in US/Extra/Mail
because the source (and binary) has hooks for SASL and TLS.
Whilst operating on a caffiene deficiency, I didn't realize this would
fall under the new laws... I just
Hrm... Maybe its time I joined debian-policy... Johnie never said there'd
be days like this ;-}
First, I guess I should mention that I'm new to Debian - I'm mostly an IBM
mainframe assembler guy for 16+ years (call be Bob, but don't give me
COBOL). My temperment seems to run along the same stre
4 matches
Mail list logo
