On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 07:43:29AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> In the default configuration, web servers shall bind to localhost only
> (okay, that's are more general policy issue affecting all network
> services).
um, that's a completely separate Policy proposal; i don't think it helps
anyone
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 05:53:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> there are only two lines or original content in the message, one
> asking which earlier mail (look into -policy archives), and the
i have looked at the archive. none of the thread titles seem germane.
could you give a hint whic
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >
> > > >>"Matthew" == Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > Matthew> can you not use unprintably-encoded mime shite? it's hard to
> > > read.
> > >
> > > shi
Reported by: Matthew Wilcox
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 212 days old.
>
> From the report itself:
>
> > All rpm-based systems support rpm --verify. Having
> > debsums support optional makes debian an inferior
> > dis
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.6.0
Severity: normal
All rpm-based systems support rpm --verify. Having debsums support
optional makes debian an inferior distribution in this aspect. Making
DEBIAN/md5sums required rather than optional would rectify this situation.
--
Revolutions do not re
i'm reopening & reassigning this bug to Policy since if Policy and the
tools disagree, one of them has to be fixed. If I'd uploaded a package
using Enhances, it would be buggy. And having a packaging bug introduced
by following Policy to the letter is not acceptable to me.
--
Revolutions do no
Sven
> do you suggest the universities start selling debian cds to finance themself.
I don't see why not. They have a captive market of near-penniless students
who would be willing to buy the CDs from them. As long as they don't get
greedy, there's no incentive for the students to bother doing
7 matches
Mail list logo
