Thanks a lot Guillem for this message.
It's very timely as we just had a discussion around these issues during
DebConf19 in Curitiba, and many of the problems that we identified and
discussed matched what your were saying.
I think the TC needs to keep working on these issues and figure out
how w
Hey Sam,
Sorry it took us so long to get back to you on this.
Sean and Ian already had quite some interesting discussion on this
subject. And
we also talked about this issue during our monthly meeting in June [1].
The rough consensus from our discussion is that the technical committee
can
al
On 10/25/06, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have replaced some uses of the word must when it was
intended to be non-normative with alternate and equivalent wording,
which makes it easier to grep for "must". This still needs to be
done for should (which I often replace
On 6/12/06, Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any coordinated effort to standardize the name of the provided
programs in /etc/alternatives?
I don't think this concerns debian-policy at all. The use of
alternatives is something that needs to be coordinated amont the
maintainers of
tag 372522 +patch
thanks
This is a simple fix, but I took the time to search and couldn't find any
other "double dot", so I decided to make a patch.
--
Bezos, (o.
Marga. (/)_
--- policy.sgml 2006-06-10 23:15:43.997173864 -0300
+++ policy-patched.sgml 2006-06-10 23:48:37.256557971 -0300
tag 366466 +patch
thanks
The first of the two bugs reported had already been fixed in the arch-repo.
The other one, hadn't been fixed, so I made a tiny patch.
Also, the margins of that paragraph were indented one extra space, so I
fixed that as well.
--
Bessos,
Maggie.
--- upgrading-check
tags 372148 +confirmed patch
tnx
I've been looking at this bug in the documentation, and what Justin says is
completely true. I've found out that my diagrams also beared this bug
(maybe because I made them while reading the docs, or maybe because policy
was updated to reflect my diagrams :-\). I
Hi!
On 6/8/06, Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-06-08T17:49-0700 Chris Waters wrote:
> Until dpkg supports it, there's little point in debating it on -policy.
So that's how it works? First dpkg implements the feature, then we can
think about making it policy?
Actually, yes. That'
8 matches
Mail list logo
