Bug#102213: interested?

2007-03-20 Thread Luther
Hi just look at this :) http://tanknk.dothome.co.kr/ regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#167004: gnome-wm

2002-10-30 Thread Sven Luther
and "desktop" tasks doesn't have GNOME start up with twm. > > It looks like a priority increase of 40 would work. Do you want to put > together a patch? If that solves the problem, then fine. Friendly, Sven Luther

Re: build-deps non non-US does not implies archiving in non-US?

2002-10-19 Thread Sven Luther
the current release. And this does not include non-us if you happen to be in the us. BTW, something similar exist also with the testing script. Does the testing script verify only the dependencies of a package for it to enter testing, or also the build-deps ? Friendly, Sven Luther

Bug#92071: packaging manual need documentation about multi-binary packages.

2001-03-29 Thread Sven LUTHER
solution. The current situation only makes thing difficult for maintainer wanting to do multi-binaries. Friendly, Sven Luther

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and app-defaults

2000-08-01 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 10:00:04AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 11:49:27AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:50:49AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Well if i install the 3.3.6 X server, it will read its configuration file &g

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and app-defaults

2000-07-28 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:50:49AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:27:55AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > Ok, about the X server, but will we maintain two sets of libraries also, or > > go > > with the 4.0.1 ones ? > > Just the 4.0.1 ones. &g

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and app-defaults

2000-07-27 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 03:00:04AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 07:59:03AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > I think what you propose is a good solution. I suppose 4.0.1 will be woody's > > primary X server, will it not ? > > I expect it to be

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and app-defaults

2000-07-27 Thread Sven LUTHER
4.0.1 will be woody's primary X server, will it not ? or else each package will have to be compiled differently for XF3.3.6 and XF4.0.1. Also, please remeber to have lintian check about app-default stuff when you release the XF4 packages. Best way to make all developper of package aware of the problem (well sure you could fill bugs to all package using app-defaults also, with a nice bug reporting script doing the job) ... Friendly, Svne LUTHER

Re: unusable examples in apckages ...

2000-06-05 Thread Sven LUTHER
ytway. Once this is done he should only need to type make or ./configure. Or else the way of use the example should be written in some kind of how_to_use ... Friendly, Sven LUTHER

Re: unusable examples in apckages ...

2000-05-30 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 02:46:48PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:58:58AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > -- > > if a package contains examples that need to be compiled, they must be in > > such >

Re: unusable examples in apckages ...

2000-05-30 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 09:22:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:58:58AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > I noticed that various packages include (specially -dev packages) includes > > examples in the /usr/share/doc/package directory. Often this examples w

Re: unusable examples in apckages ...

2000-05-30 Thread Sven LUTHER
d, and only someone who wants to test them will unzip this, thus using less space in /usr ... Friendly, Sven LUTHER

unusable examples in apckages ...

2000-05-30 Thread Sven LUTHER
make clean, leaving the package in a neat state (well dpkg handles badly when you change a xxx.gz file by a xxx file.). Please cc any mail to me, as i don't read this mailing list. Friendly, Svne LUTHER