Bug#690495: Bug#689095: [debian-policy] Prohibit click-through licenses or disclaimers

2012-10-14 Thread Leo 'costela7; Antunes
st get rid of it completely. Making it less intrusive would diminish its worth as a disclaimer and therefore miss the point entirely. (again: I'm arguing this from the point of view I expect upstream to take) Cheers [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/10/msg2.html -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#621833: System users: removing them

2011-04-13 Thread Leo 'costela7; Antunes
ars later and ask yourself where that user came from. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4da61068.8000...@debian.org

Re: RFC: cups as "default" printing system for lenny?

2007-11-11 Thread Leo "costela" Antunes
hile idea. One of the possible advantages for a different paradigm would be for "reduced" CDDs, such as Emdebian, whose standard set of packages might divert considerably by having _less_ packages, in which case the current task system would fall short, AFAICT. Cheers -- Leo "