Russ Allbery writes:
> started experimenting with the new copyright file format, I never
> documented the license or copyright information for any of the
> Autotools-generated files, and I never heard a peep of concern about
> that.)
Currently the ftpmasters don't require those copyrights to be l
José Luis González writes:
> I am sorry but debian-policy isn't featured in
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages
That's because it is a real package. Also, you could have asked on the
debian-policy mailing list.
> If the right place to file bugs against the Policy is the debian-policy
>
José Luis González writes:
> Do you agree now?
If you mean do I agree that you should file a bug against
www.debian.org because it doesn't say anything specific about filing
bugs against Debian Policy, then no, I disagree. Any Debian Developer
(or at the very least, every package maintainer) shou
I think what José is reporting is that in his opinion the BTS (and
actually all pseudopackages available in the BTS) should be considered
a part of the release and there should be Policy instructions as to
how the BTS should work, so that there would be clear grounds as to
which bugs against the ps
Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the
Do note that such proposals need to be sent to debian-vote to be
effective.
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *
* PGP public key
5 matches
Mail list logo
