On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 06:55:31PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> You are quite right; when a doom engine is added providing
> doom-engine, which does *not* support boom features, you
> could end up with an unplayable combination by installing
> freedoom and having the "doom-e
a pessimistic
approach: some users will search for "doom" and install the
first thing they see; others will seek out an engine
they've heard of; others will take the game resource route.
This is why we have this pseudo-circular dependency, to
cover both bases.
--
Jon Dowland
--
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 11:03:57AM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Jon Dowland wrote:
>> A brief explanation as to their meaning. Doom games are
>> divided into engine and world-resource components. The
>> former is captured by 'doom-engine'.
>
> I don&#x
le combination by installing
freedoom and having the "doom-engine" dependency satisfied
by this new, non-boom engine.
--
Jon Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ages debian-policy suggests:
ii doc-base 0.8.16 utilities to manage online documen
-- no debconf information
--
Jon Dowland
http://jmtd.net/
--- virtual-package-names-list.txt~ 2009-03-03 18:49:11.0 +
+++ virtual-package-names-list.txt 2009-03-03 18:52:
ial: yes or
which are depended on by build-essential.
I haven't thought of a clear way of wording this, though.
--
Jon Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 1150848896 past the epoch, Linas Žvirblis wrote:
> Jon Dowland wrote:
> >> -- Text
> >> ++ Text Tools/Utilities/Accessories...
> >
> > Could you give an example of what would belong there?
>
> That is a no, unless you can provide a very accurate
> d
happens.
> -- Text
> ++ Text Tools/Utilities/Accessories...
Could you give an example of what would belong there?
--
Jon Dowland
http://alcopop.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> sacrificed to linguistic perfection.
Hi, It's not clear from your message whether you are
referring to a specific portion of the proposal, or the
proposal as a whole. Could you clarify?
--
Jon Dowland
http://alcopop.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to the same
lockfile or tempfile and the possible interleavings that
could happen if checks for the file were not atomic.
--
Jon Dowland
http://alcopop.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
alacrity
http://whywaitlonger.com/cams2.php?SEVY
Jon
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.6.1.1
Severity: wishlist
Hello, I am following the steps in virtual-package-names-list.txt[1] in
order to add (or not add) the virtual package name 'x-display-manager'
to the authorative list of virtual package names.
The virtual package x-display-manager is desc
Greatyet more spamsomething really needs to be
done about this, I'm fed up of blocking all these
addresses
Jon
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome to J.T. Sterlings
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> Jon Eisenstein wrote:
> > Although I haven't tried it myself, I know many people have used another
> > alternative and have had no major problems: Change sources.list to point
> > to unstable, apt-get install X, and change sourc
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Here's the problem as I see it. I want to run an operating system
> where I get to choose the level of instability. So, when I run
> "apt-get update", I only want to get stable packages downloaded. On
> the other hand, I want to be able to run Python
is should go to. If it belongs on debian-policy alone and not
debian-devel, please respond only on the former.
Jon Eisenstein
nd everybody is friends
again.
Jon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
17 matches
Mail list logo
