Re: Bug#133306: apt-listchanges: Does not handle .pyc files correctly

2002-02-18 Thread Jim Penny
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 11:00:53AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 06:31:49PM -0500, Jim Penny wrote: > > OK, I am clearly not going to persuade you how wrong-headed ;-) you are, > > so proceed. > > > > Please use the debconf model. If ther

Re: VERY URGENT

2002-01-29 Thread Jim Penny
ped.com/_disc4/00bb.htm+george+shimony+export&hl=en&ie=utf-8 This reveals the same letter by: ibrahim koroma You are not even a good enough scammer to come up with a letter of your very own. My, my, my. What a very sad little puppy you are. Jim Penny [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oh, and yo

Re: Software Licenced Under a Specific Version of GPL

2001-08-30 Thread Jim Penny
ied_ GPL, or include the original GPL with a rider clause in COPYRIGHT? Or, should the "GPL with 'or later version' removed" be included in common licenses? After all, as I recall, the kernel itself is now distributed with such a license! Jim Penny > -- > Change you

Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated

2001-08-13 Thread Jim Penny
es multiple levels of compliance, python-popy happens to be at level 2. python-popy: module providing programmers a database adapter from python to Pos tgreSQL using the Python Database API Specification 2.0 (level 2 compliant) I assert that in some sense, this is a minimal correct short description. It can be shortened. But even a confusing description hitting only the keywords is more than 80 characters, e.g. python-popy database adapter PostgreSQL Python Database API Specification 2.0 (level 2 compliant) What is the correct solution? Jim Penny [EMAIL PROTECTED]