On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:15:31AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15 2017, James McCoy wrote:
>
> > One thing I'd like to note is that none of the vim-$lang virtual
> > packages are currently listed in Policy's set of virtual packages.
> > That was a
Thanks for starting the discussion, Victor.
One thing I'd like to note is that none of the vim-$lang virtual
packages are currently listed in Policy's set of virtual packages. That
was an oversight on the Vim maintainers side when the package names were
introduced, but maybe now would be a good t
he maintainer cannot
> remove the former while keeping the latter anymore.
>
> I call this less flexible, but I may miss your point.
Agreed. We shouldn't be introducing divergence between how Files: and
Files-Excluded: are interpreted.
Cheers,
--
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB
ead VCS with theis
> > problem, I wouldn't object to codifying Vcs- fields for the others in
> > the meantime; but some people might find it equally unpalatable to
> > specify fields for everything except git.
Any VCS workflow which uses different branches for d
4 matches
Mail list logo