of times in the past and people always agree
that it is a good idea but no one with the requisite skills seems to have
the time to actually implement it.
In the meantime for dovecot, I'll move the certificate to /etc/dovecot as
suggested.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
yones
satisfaction ASAP.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.DEB.2.02.1205301817190.24374@kubuntu
pened around dpkg 1.9 but isn't in the
changelog.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ues and got confused. :-)
So is this a dpkg-parsechangelog bug or have the archive scripts not
caught up to new developments yet?
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
narily be
> > rather boring. (especially if you change /var/mail permissions to
> > 3775)
So the issues are:
1. What is the rationale for the policy mail spools must be 0660 $USER:mail?
2. Is that the only supported configuration?
3. If not, what kinds of configurations does a package have to support?
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ut 10 minutes to create this package and I must have spent less than an
hour maintaining it so I don't have any particular attachment to it or
anything.
But please stop kvetching on the mailing lists and do something if you
expect anyone to listen.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ht one. Uncle Debian in his wisdom makes the
choice for him and takes care of the details.
As Joey has already said, most of us will find that kind of automatic
choice too.restrictive. Fine, task packages aren't meant for us.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
in the bug reports but other problems may crop up
and other packages that require c-client (pine, libmail-cclient-perl)
may need to be recompiled. Or I can make the decision to stick with
$HOME or stick with $HOME/mail even if it causes issues for some
people. What should I do?
--
Jaldhar H
Thanks that's what I thought but it's nice to have a second opinion. I've
filed a bug against pine.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, 26 Apr 1998, Raul Miller wrote:
> The needs expressed were:
>
> (1) there's a bug in debian pine
> (2) he
that
situation change if it is just a link? Assuming I can't fulfill his
request, how else can I help this user while conforming to Debian policy?
Some guidance is requested.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
so. As soon as I get a moment to breathe, I
will upload the package and everyone can decide for themselves.
As for the larger issue, while it is true that unstable will become stable
eventually, surely this won't be allowed to happen until a thorough
review has been made and all serious bug
apd package and the new one both work well for me but I
don't have an NFS environment or anything to really test issues like
locking. So I'd like the QA group to take a look. Because if there is a
chance it could eat mail, I think we should just take it out of the
distribution.
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
