On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:58:47PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 22:12 +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:12:45PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:23:51AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > >
> >
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:12:45PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:23:51AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > What about these clauses as a Policy amendment?
> >
> > 1. If a library *only supports the retrieval of FOO_LIBS and / or
> > FOO_CFLAGS by the use of pkg-config*,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 11:48:16AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:25:28 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Wed, 09 Aug 2006, sean finney wrote:
> >> > > Thanks to the work of our DPL Anthony "aj" Towns (and all the
> >> > > other peopl
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 05:19:30PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jakob Bohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Is this feature seldom used, so we do not care much about it; or is
> >> it often used, and so possibly worth retaining?
> >
> > I
not necessarily the only or best one.
Side note:
As a security specialist I am increasingly annoyed by this kind
of loud shouting about security pseudo-bugs drowning out real
security discussions and frequently forcing vendors to make
extremely ill-advised system changes that actually harm securi
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 04:18:14PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 03:17:19PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Let A and B both be packages that provide virtual package C. A is the
> > default C in Debian, and is therefore Priority: important. A depends
> > on E and F, which must
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 07:48:43PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> It might be a good idea to specify how quoting should be handled, both for
> shell metacharacters and format specifiers.
>
> >From the existing text, it seems that "command part" means "shell command
> part", and it is impossible to
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 07:20:51AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 10:23:10PM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> >
> > Also, careful examination of the adduser implementation in
> > woody indicates that the package really only needs its
> > dependencies to b
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 07:05:44PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Jakob Bohm wrote:
> > Note that only a few packages will need these dependencies,
> > unlike libc6. Specifically, these packages will be needed by a
> > subset of the packages that currently Depends: adduser .
>
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 09:59:13AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Objection. There is no way to create any user in preinst as the tool
> >> to do so is not in an essential package.
> >
> > This is what pre-depends are for.
>
> A single pre-dependency is
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 03:05:21PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 06:27:05PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > After the 486, Intel always provided a method to determine the CPU type and
> > features available. As far as I can tell, there's no easy programmatic wa
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 02:06:20AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:12:12PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Chris Waters wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:06:05PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> ...
>
> --- policy.sgml~ 2003-03-13 02:0
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 09:22:53AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> ...
>
> This doesn't solve the problem, and -Bsymbolic only solves a portion of
> the problem.
>
> ...
I have looked at -Bsymbolic, and it seems to be doing about the
same as my proposed change (see elsewhere), however the docs on
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 12:50:25PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Please excuse the (minor) cross-post but I think the technical
> committee needs to find an answer and that answer then be set in
> policy.
>
> We need to make a decision on how to properly handle multiple libra
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 10:41:52PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 08:51:39PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Of course, these checks alone do not make a message to be marked as spam,
> > but
> > we should avoid the risk anyway, since it's easy to do so.
>
> But what do you wa
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:30:09AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 03:07, Jakob Bohm wrote:
>
> > I agree, this is the only way to go. Naive, simple, classic
> > UNIX-style programming should continue to "just work",
>
> Naïve, simple, cla
Hello everybody,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 10:15:24PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> Hello Colin,
>
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 09:50:26PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > In summary, UTF-8 is the *only* sane character set to use for
> > filenames.
> At least I agree to this :-)
>
> I think that we need
17 matches
Mail list logo
