En réponse à Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 01:35:38PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > I've seen some UTF-8-encoded debian/changelog files but I haven't
> > seen anything mentioning it is allowed in Debian Policy.
> >
> &g
Hi,
I've seen some UTF-8-encoded debian/changelog files but I haven't
seen anything mentioning it is allowed in Debian Policy.
According to #174982, the proposal has been accepted but the bug
is still open. When is this planned for?
Thanks.
--
Jérôme Marant
ion of ~ wanted a stable release
> between its implementation in the tools and the start of its use in
> packages, too.
Adam Heath has already added it in the APT CVS. It should be in the
upcoming release. Any news Adam?
--
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://marant.org
n no confused users
> because of it.
So, would you second my proposal?
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
not up to date on the requirements.
"
I could modify the patch so that it installs the alternative all the
time, but I implemented it that way because Policy doesn't mention
the manpage.
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
d point to the manpage of the
window manager which is run through x-window-manager.
Isn't it logical?
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
but first I need to find a more capable fontset.
Using Gnus, I could read all of them.
If it is about xfonts, I have:
xfonts-100dpi
xfonts-100dpi-transcoded
xfonts-75dpi
xfonts-75dpi-transcoded
xfonts-base
xfonts-base-transcoded
xfonts-intl-european
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
etwm spec for window type.
Jesus! Not to have the wizzy icon with the picture of my dog on it in the
top-left
corner when I launch Kmahjongg in un-bea-ra-ble!!
Seriously, I won't fight against anything that will be decided about this ;-)
I just don't see any reason for it.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
o be a distinction made between "I want all of the GNOME/KDE apps
> running" and "I want konqueror/koffice/whatever". The second item does not
> require any real support from the wm.
AFAIK, one can run a KDE or GNOME app without any support from the wm,
am I wrong?
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
ually, I would do the contrary, because since it aims at supporting
kde and gnome, it does not enhance your system but it rather bloats
it. So instead of being a plus, it is a minus ;-)
So every wm that does not support kde and gnome should have a higher
priority ;-)
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've put the library in /usr/lib/debauch but the warning remains.
> >
> > The symlink itself triggers the warning whereever is located the
> > library.
>
> You can't move the symlink as well? libfakeroot does. If you
I also moved the symlink.
>Is the library is never linked against directly, then I think it's best
>to put it somewhere other than in /usr/lib/. That removes some
>possibility of confusion, both in Lintian and in users' minds.
>(Compare with libfakeroot, for example.)
I've put the library in /usr/lib/debauch but the warn
Hi,
debauch is a malloc debugger that I adopted recently.
Before I adopted it, there was already one lintian
warning :
W: debauch: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libdebauch.so.0.1
usr/lib/libdebauch.so
debauch contains a script called `debauch' which run the program
to debu
Hi,
I'm wonder whether the Erlang Public Licence and the GPL
are compatible. The EPL is a Mozilla PL derivative and
the MPL is incompatible with the GPL, so I fear about the
EPL status.
Can anyone confirm ?
Thanks.
--
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://jerome.marant.free.fr
Hi,
A lot of people are complaining about severity levels that are
usually positionned a wrong way.
These levels are describes in Debian documentationq but IMHO,
explainations are not explicit enough.
I think it could be worth giving a real example for each of
these levels. I'm sure this would h
15 matches
Mail list logo
