Bug#321792: debian-policy: §6.5 (3)(1): missing "Error unwind:" for "new-postrm abort-upgrade"

2005-08-07 Thread Henning Makholm
" in the second sentence seems to be spurious. -- Henning Makholm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321790: debian-policy: typo in §5.6.3: "co-maintaintainers"

2005-08-07 Thread Henning Makholm
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.6.2.1 Severity: minor | | Uploaders | | |List of the names and email addresses of |co-maintaintainers of the package, if any. If the package |has other maintainers beside the one named in the

Re: dehs will stop

2005-02-27 Thread Henning Makholm
less. > 2) Submitting 6229 wishlist bug is not possible/is not the solution > (without proposing alternatives method) Now you have a third reply: Explain why people should care, and someone might actually start caring. -- Henning Makholm

Re: dehs will stop

2005-02-27 Thread Henning Makholm
instead of just lamenting their lack of a telepathic understanding of your intentions? -- Henning Makholm"Nu kommer han. Kan du ikke høre knallerten?"

Re: Package which uses jam (instead make)

2003-10-28 Thread Henning Makholm
make that I'm familiar with. > The fact that GNU make turns these into make variables is not > important. It *is* a part of the interface that I can compile my own patched version of make that hardcodes one or more of these variables, and expect things to work when I ask it to interpret

Re: webmin license

1999-12-20 Thread Henning Makholm
John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thus webmin could conceivably be judged DFSG free for > Debian GNU/Linux and fall into non-free for all other ports. There is no such thing as "DFSG-free on platform X". It either is everywhere or isn't any