Re: Policy Suggestion - User Configuration Files

2003-01-09 Thread Gerd Knorr
> > It caches information to reduce startup times. dlopen() 10 *.so files > > and doing various function calls to get all the info stored in that file > > takes some time ... > > Yeah but I _don't_ _need_ _no_ _libquicktime_ _codecs_, so avoiding to waste > all that time can be done simply by not

Re: Policy Suggestion - User Configuration Files

2003-01-09 Thread Gerd Knorr
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 07:30:33PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 01:08:45PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > Still speaking as a user, I'm not annoyed by a dotfile per program I > > use. I'm much more annoyed by all the useless dotfiles, created by > > programs that I run once

Re: Bug#171221: openmotif: openmotif is not a native package

2002-11-30 Thread Gerd Knorr
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 05:24:58PM +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote: > > > > "should" or "must"? I can't find anything in the policy saying > > I *must* package it this way, it just says it is usually done this > > way. Thus I hereby close that bu

Bug#91261: PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy

2001-03-28 Thread Gerd Knorr
> Perhaps we should get the OpenMotif package maintainer's input. > Gerd, do you have any suggestions regarding this policy proposal? It's a bit more difficuilt. There are two major Motif versions: 1.2 and 2.x. lesstif focuses on reimplementing the version 1.2 API (unless it has changed recently