Re: Are packages allowed to ship files in /srv?

2006-07-23 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 23 July 2006 11:25, Russ Allbery wrote: > George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I don't see /var/www mentioned in FHS, and we have bunch of web-based > > applications (think of whatever www-based admin package, like phppgadmin > > for instance)

Re: Are packages allowed to ship files in /srv?

2006-07-23 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday 22 July 2006 21:09, Russ Allbery wrote: --cut-- > The other side (disclosure: this is my personal opinion) is that the > second-to-last sentence of the second paragraph argues strongly against > shipping files in /srv as part of the package. By doing so, the package > is imposing struc

Re: Bug#375502: debian-policy must clarify how sub-policies should be managed

2006-06-27 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 13:46, Frank Küster wrote: --cut-- > > Why do you think "are all normative and authoritative", is not correct, > > if sub-policies are part of debian-policy or referenced to by the above > > mentioned 1.4 debian-policy paragraph ? > > Sorry, I misparsed this sentence, or rat

Re: Bug#375502: debian-policy must clarify how sub-policies should be managed

2006-06-27 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 12:19, Frank Küster wrote: > George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The sub-policy documents either can be part of this debian-policy > > document or referenced to by this paragraph. They are maintained by their > > authors and are all

Re: Bug#375502: debian-policy must clarify how sub-policies should be managed

2006-06-27 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 10:10, George Danchev wrote: > On Tuesday 27 June 2006 01:43, Chris Waters wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 06:05:17PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > > What you tend to disagree with ? I'm asking for clarification how > > > sub-policies m

Re: Bug#375502: debian-policy must clarify how sub-policies should be managed

2006-06-27 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 01:43, Chris Waters wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 06:05:17PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > What you tend to disagree with ? I'm asking for clarification how > > sub-policies must be handled, and this must be stipulated by the > > debian-

Bug#375502: debian-policy must clarify how sub-policies should be managed

2006-06-26 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 26 June 2006 19:10, Ian Jackson wrote: > George Danchev writes ("Bug#375502: debian-policy must clarify how sub-policies should be managed"): > > The current paragraphs of #1.4, #11.9, #11.9 show perl-policy as > > a part debian-policy package and emacs-pol

Re: Bug#375502: debian-policy must clarify how sub-policies should be managed

2006-06-26 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 26 June 2006 17:37, Frank Küster wrote: > George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Package: debian-policy > > Version: 3.7.2.1 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > The current paragraphs of #1.4, #11.9, #11.9 show perl-policy as > > a par

Bug#375502: debian-policy must clarify how sub-policies should be managed

2006-06-26 Thread George Danchev
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.7.2.1 Severity: wishlist The current paragraphs of #1.4, #11.9, #11.9 show perl-policy as a part debian-policy package and emacs-policy as a separate package. I think that all sub-policies should obey same rules, e.g. each of them to be managed in a separate packa