Re: first proposal for a new maintainer policy

1998-04-28 Thread G John Lapeyre
On 28 Apr 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Is that such a bad thing, really? I would rather that the > policy documents be corrected, and held as a set of rules htat > have to be followed, woth an exception for the items that happen to Debian is great and everything, but it

Re: maintainer policy and project organization

1998-02-04 Thread G John Lapeyre
eir interface to the larger organization as simple as possible. G John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre

Re: beta software ok for unstable? (was: Re: policy Q's WRT imapd)

1998-02-03 Thread G John Lapeyre
stereoscopic modeler from Poland. (GPL) . John G John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre

Re: books from docs

1998-01-27 Thread G John Lapeyre
Two of three pdl authors have agreed to a perltoot-like statement. I bet the 3rd does soon. So that solves that much of the problem. But the policy could still use some clarification. John G John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizo

Making books from docs again

1998-01-27 Thread G John Lapeyre
ount on it. from "man pdl" (still on master in Incoming, destined for unstable distribution) Copyright (C) Karl Glazebrook ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), Tuomas J. Lukka, ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and Christian Soeller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 1997. Commercial r