On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 01:04:24PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:52:01AM +0100
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:14:12PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> telnet-server is useful because it allows you to conflict with all the
> packages that run a telnetd. If your intent is for all radius daemons
> to conflict with radius-server, then I agree the the vp is useful.
>
After some discussi
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:14:12PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> telnet-server is useful because it allows you to conflict with all the
> packages that run a telnetd. If your intent is for all radius daemons
> to conflict with radius-server, then I agree the the vp is useful.
>
Yep, all radius ser
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 08:04:41AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Francesco" == Francesco Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Francesco> All this programs provide a RADIUS server for
> Francesco> acct/auth. Generally the daemon is
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 05:45:57PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
>
> What interface does a package providing this VP have to export?
> I.E. what commands/files/etc can I guarantee are present when this vp
> is installed.
>
> Or put another way why is it useful?
>
All this programs provide a RADI
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.6.0
Severity: wishlist
As discussed among all radius servers mnts, it seems a good thing to define
a new VP 'radius-server' which should be provided at this time by:
radiusd-cistron
radiusd-livingston
xtradius
yardradius
radiusd-freeradius
radiusd-freeradius-
6 matches
Mail list logo
